I have a degree in psychology, I work with people, and from my perspective, the Catalog of Human Population, information from which you are offering, seems very interesting to me. I understand that I am no expert in this, but I can imagine that if this Catalog provides information from the unconscious of a person, then it is very valuable, and also I think that knowledge of the Suppressing Manipulation Mode, which causes obedience in a person, is also very valuable. As for the Stimulating Manipulation Mode, don’t you think that a good psychologist can do this without knowledge from the Catalog? Another matter is the mode of gaining trust, which you call Balancing Mode, as things are not so simple with this…

You are deeply mistaken. However, such mistakes are quite natural for a person, who never used natural human manipulation modes from the Catalog of Human Population on practice.

“…As for the Stimulating Manipulation Mode, don’t you think that a good psychologist can do this without knowledge from the Catalog? …” Your opinion is not original, as all psychologists think this. However, then it is not clear why all of them always have such huge problems with that what is called “motivation?”

While the “secret” is simple: everybody knows that in order to stimulate different people to certain actions—different stimuli are necessary, but not everyone knows that 293 human subtypes exist in nature and that there is exactly the same number of Stimulating Manipulation Modes. And, it is necessary to know them as opposed to guessing and trying one variant after another or trying to apply the same methodology for everyone.

As for the Balancing Manipulation Mode of a person, it is impossible to agree with you because with “the mode of gaining trust” (which, it should be noted, is just one of many effects that natural balancing mode of a person provides) in reality everything is just as easy as with suppression and stimulation. All that is required is to know precisely what to transmit to which specific person.