My colleagues and I (psychologists) got descriptions of different people from the Catalog. We were surprised by that programs of men and women do not differ in anything besides small details in the sexual factor. And, in some descriptions a difference between a woman and a man was not found at all. Although from a psychological point of view, there is a huge difference. How can this be explained?

The Catalog of Human Population describes natural human “software,” and it should not be confused with artificial “software” that exists in this civilization. In this civilization, it is customary to assume that there is a difference between male and female psychology, meanwhile in nature there is no such difference or it is expressed in a completely different way.

In this civilization it is common to instill roles for women and men (for example, “women are weak and defenseless, and men are strong”), which by nature they do not have. In nature, male and female animals are not inferior to each other in anything, not in any one of their natural qualities—they are equally strong, fast, both find food (and hunt) equally well, or defend themselves against enemies, protect their territory, offspring.

Based on what was stated above, psychological difference between men and women is pure fiction, made up by psychologists as well. And, this question is clearly not to the Catalog of Human Population, as the ancient manuscript Shan Hai Jing that we are decrypting does not describe civilizational fabrications and perversions.

As for purely physiological difference between males and females in nature and men and women—this question is for physiologists, as the Catalog of Human Population describes psyche, not physiology.