My friends also became interested in the Catalog of Human Population. And, many people are asking me questions because I have been using the Catalog for a few years now. However, I do not know how to explain some things (not so much to them, but to myself). For example, there is this one woman whose question brought me to an impasse, as she said that she knows a person, who was born on the same day as she was, but they are not similar. Is this because she “lies, as a woman?” Or do people perceive themselves incorrectly (from suppressing or balancing modes, for example)?

First of all, you are absolutely correct in your suppositions. Naturally, a person, who does not know his/her natural program, tends to imagine himself/herself an individual from his suppressing mode or balancing mode. A sense of self as an individual from his/her natural program does not cause him/her to feel the same narcotic-pleasant feelings, as the “dream mode.” This is why they fantasize in regard to themselves.

Also, you absolutely correctly identified that she “lies, as a woman.” One of the well-known postulates of artificial software of women is the following: “A woman always lies. A woman who does not lie is sick.” And so, women lie. And, like your friend, they are convinced that they are healthy. Although with regard to their health everything is exactly the opposite. They are not healthy, and even that is an understatement. However, anyway, all women do this, and they are not aware of that they are automatically executing the program of artificial software, which, using the computer language, was “installed” in them in the distant childhood, and on the basis of which they live like zombies.

Plus, often they do this quite consciously (both women and men), as they are so deathly afraid that someone might know what they are like real that they naively think that their “negative opinion” might make someone doubt the existence of the Catalog of Human Population; even though such expectations are very naïve.

Secondly, you and I do not personally know that person, with whom she supposedly compared herself. And, even if he/she does exist, we did not see his/her passport or other ID. Since it happens quite often that a person was told 20 times about the difference between people, who were born on the same day in the same month and one was born in a leap year and the other in a common year, but he/she did not even remember this and compared himself/herself with a person belonging to a different subtype structure, and then stated that they are not like each other.

Finally, let’s not forget that people, who were born with the same subtype program, mostly live not according to their program, but on the basis of that artificial “software,” which was forcibly “installed” in them by parents and upbringers. And, parents (or people, who replaced parents) “installed” nothing other than a part of their own personal natural “software.” This was done by the following guidance, which is known to everyone: “Do as I do!” (If you have not yet read the book Ahnenerbe—Your Killer Is Under Your Skin—this phenomenon is described in there in detail.) As a result, two people, who were born on the same day (taking leapness of birth year into account), live according to programs of their mothers and fathers instead of their own natural program, and their parents are people, who have different subtype programs. As a result, two people, who were born on the same day (taking leapness of birth year into account), despite that they belong to the same subtype—seem different.

However, “seem” does not mean that it is really like this. Since artificial “software” of a person is always “on the surface.” It was created in order to be “worn as a mask,” to demonstrate it in society, to cover up a person’s true, natural qualities by hiding “his/her true face” behind it. To a great extent, people are forced to hide manifestations of their natural programs because they do not fit into the narrow confines prescribed by society. Therefore, sometimes it is very difficult for a nonprofessional to see, to fully notice manifestations of a natural program.

Everyone, even those people, who are not psychologists, are familiar with manifestations of artificial “software,” both from personal life experience and from many books on psychology (which do not describe true psychology of people, but only mechanisms and manifestations of artificial software—nothing more). In order to qualitatively monitor manifestations of natural “software” of a person, it is necessary to have a description of this subtype, or at least know images of his/her natural program from the Catalog of Human Population. Without having knowledge of your own natural program, someone else’s natural program, all the details related to different types of human “software”—it is an impossible task to monitor something. And, how can any comparisons be made without doing qualitative monitoring first?