As it was found by Andrey Davydov, the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population, a human is not an evolved ape, as Darwinists state; Homo sapiens is a biological type that by its natural arrangement is not in any way related to neither monkeys, nor any other kind of animal. Since the basis, on which biological type “human” appears and functions is completely different.
If we consider the structure of psyche of Homo sapiens, about which neither Darwin, nor the followers of theory of evolution known nothing, a human being is totally different from any animal. However, of course, in order to state this with confidence, it is necessary to know what human psyche is, how it is arranged and how it works; and, of course, on what basis. In short, everything that lies in the plane of value, which is unknown to anthropologists, psychologists, and so on, called psyche (“soul”) of a human*. On the one hand, they define psyche as a systematic property of highly organized matter that manifests in a particular reflection of objective reality by a subject**, i.e., they consider it as a system; while, on the other hand, there was not a single scientific source found that would state that human soul is a system, which is one hundred percent identifiable.
However, in general, psychologists’ approach to human soul can be considered correct—it is indeed possible to understand the construct of the soul when considering it as a system. As Sima Qian (II-I centuries BC), the creator of Chinese historical science, stated: “once classified, it can be known.” Having identified six factors, of which human psyche consists, Andrey Davydov not just came closer to the soul as a system that is a carrier of information, but also one of the requirements of classification systems was observed—compilation of fundamental sections, which are principally different from each other in their characteristics and criteria.
And, what is the basis? When it comes to a Homo sapiens, the basis of his existence, as Andrey Davydov found, are archetypal programs. These programs consist of chimeric formations, while chimeras are expressed in images. The latter is systematized into a scheme, which in a new direction in scientific psychology called Non-traditional Psychoanalysis (which does not using any existing methods in psychology, and is based solely on the decryption of the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) that turned out to be the Catalog of human population) is known as “individual archetypal pattern.”
The difference between a human and an animal is not in that what is commonly believed, for example, possession of the ability to think and articulate speech, work activity, creation and use of tools, alleged “spiritual needs,” and so on. The only difference is in that animals are much more primitive in terms of images that are the basis of their life activities. An animal, or any other natural object, has only one image in its biological program. For example: only a monkey, only a horse, only salmon, only a pine, only an ant, only an orchid, only a stone, only gold. However, a human has a natural biological program, which is recorded by an impressive number of natural images, and this program, conditionally speaking, can contain a monkey, and a horse, and salmon, and a pine, and an orchid, and an ant, and stones, and gold, and much more, for example, rivers, lakes and seas, mountains and valleys, grasses and trees, various soils. And, this is far from all.
There are 293 unique human programs described in the ancient source 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas), and one program can be recorded by over one hundred different images. It is not surprising that a human has a much greater survival rate in nature than any other natural object.
Although only in potential. Without knowledge of his natural program, a person is inferior even to animals in some psychophysiological parameters, for example, strength, agility, speed, visual acuity, etc. Even though it is all there in human potential, without knowledge it will never work. However, this does not make Homo sapiens relatives of primates.
* “Having accumulated rich experimental material, having developed unique methods of experimental study of psyche, today psychophysics reached an impasse. It lost the very subject of its application. Breaking out of the deadlock is possible in acquisition of scientific interest, namely, in defining its place in solution of the main problem of psychology (anthropology, philosophy): what is psyche.” K. D. Zarochentsev, A. I. Khudyakov, First Russian Philosophical Convention: Crisis of Modern Psycho-Diagnostics, St. Petersburg, 1997, Vol. 7, p. 451.
“To state something fundamental about a modern, civilized human is one of the most difficult and thankless tasks that one can think of since the one who states, is limited by the same conditions and is blinded by the same prejudices, as those about whom he has to express his views.” C. G. Jung, Soul Problems of Our Time, Moscow, 1994, pp. 158-184.
** “Psyche (from the Greek psychikos – soulful) is a systematic property of highly organized matter, manifested in a subject’s particular reflection of objective reality, and includes introjected modeling by him of this reality and regulation on the basis of created model of his behavior and activities. The study of patterns of development and functioning of psyche is the subject of psychology as a science.” N. I. Konukhov, Dictionary-Reference Book of Psychology, Moscow, 1996.