When I started learning different images of programs of people from Catalog of Human Population, I noticed that there are natural programs of Homo sapiens recorded by a small number of images, and in programs of some people there is a huge number of images. What advantage does a person (human subtype), whose program is recorded by a large number of images, have over a person, whose program contains a small number of images?

Subtypes of type Homo sapiens have individual archetypal patterns that vary by volume. Some human programs have, for example, thirty images, while others might contain over one hundred images. However, it is worth noting that the quantity of images, by which human programs are recorded, do not at all make one subtype superior to another subtype or subtypes.

Research that was carried out by Andrey Davydov (the author of the discovery of the Catalog of human population) and his colleagues engaged in decryption of the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), and their comparative analysis showed that by potential that was implanted in a particular subtype—all subtypes are equal.

Moreover, it is impossible to discuss competition between subtypes. It is the same as in the world of animals: a dog cannot compete with a bird or a fish, and lions are not superior to elephants. They cannot be compared because they are different. In the same way, every human subtype has their own spheres of functionality, their own diapason of abilities.

For this reason, existing ideas in civilization about superiority of one group of people over another is archaism, from the point of view that humanity is a type, in which there are 293 subtypes with different psychophysiological sets of qualities. Superiority of one person (or groups of people) over another can take place only within one human subtype, and not between those people, who belong to different subtypes.

According to information from the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), which turned out to be nothing other than the Catalog of human population, people can surpass each other only by one criterion: psychophysiological qualities, psychophysiological abilities that get achieved on the basis of knowledge from the Catalog of human population, but are not in any way connected with skin color, nationality, or association with some social group.

Superiority among subtypes within human society can exist only because some use knowledge about themselves and other people from the Catalog of human population, and some do not. According to research carried out by representatives of Non-traditional Psychoanalysis—this is not the norm; in principle, competition among subtypes should not exist in human society.