-Prior to ordering materials from the Catalog of Human Population, it would be desirable to have an opportunity to test this information. I already looked at demos presented on the website and they interested me, but demos contain a very small amount of information about people and I would like to have more info, so I can test how the Catalog works. Do I really have to pay in order to test?
Probably you are not taking into account two key points when you are posing this question.
1. Neither the Human Population Academy, nor the developers of the Catalog of Human Population are interested in anyone’s testing of how the Catalog of Human Population works. Since verification of this scientific researcher already took place in Russia back in the 90s of the 20th century. And, as for us, our many years of personal experience, including work with clients, have already shown and proven everything to us.
2. Neither the Academy, nor the developers of the Catalog engage in proving something to someone.
Therefore, if someone wants to test whether the Catalog of Human Population exists or not—he/she will do it using his/her own money. For those, who have problems with finances or do not want to pay in order to test, we provided free demos. There are over 100 demos, and this is more than enough. And, this is quite logical since a car dealership allows you to test-drive a car, but no one gifts it to a client only so that he/she can make sure that the car functions. This is absurd, nonsense. And, we do not engage in nonsense.
And, if someone does not want to spend his/her money on testing, then he/she can continue to "eat information" from astrological prognoses, etc. We have nothing against this, this is their right. However, it is not our problem.
-Why do developers of the Catalog of Human Population consider images the proto-language?
Because the main developers of the Catalog of Human Population—Andrey Davydov and Olga Skorbatyuk—get any kind of information about any representative of the biological type Homo sapiens precisely from images, which are hieroglyphically recorded in the ancient manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing). On this basis it was concluded that natural images are that protolanguage, which linguists have long been looking for.
As it is known, protolanguage is a language that is being reconstructed by linguists—it is the language of the earliest communities of Homo sapiens sapiens (modern humans), which had dialects already in Africa 80-160 thousands of years ago. However, if it is also known that a human being, of any race, nationality and language group thinks in images, then—is an image not the protolanguage of the existing population of Homo sapiens?
Words, in any language, are only a form of transmission of mental images. After all, a person, who is deaf since birth does not hear words of any language, but this does not mean that he lacks the process of thinking. Unconscious of a human, his physiology, as well as human cells, do not understand the words of any language.
If a cell would understand the language of words, geneticists would not have the following problem: "How to talk to a cell?" Cells understand each other, but they do not understand a human behind the apparatus for transmission of information to cells. Geneticists need a language that cells understand. However, this problem has not been solved to this day since they already know that human cells communicate with each other by images, but exactly which images need to be transmitted to cells of a specific organism—they do not know.
In conclusion, it is worth noting that the transition from hieroglyphics to phonemographic language left words without images. An image is expressed by a word, recorded by letters of an alphabet, and each person who says it—at the basis has his own, individual image that is different from the image of another person, who uses that same word. The meaning, the essence, the same diapason of understanding with replacement of hieroglyphic writing with phonemographic—by varying degrees destructurizes interpersonal relationships.
The only culture that preserved hieroglyphic writing unchanged is the culture of China. By virtue of this, the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), which in spite of everything was also preserved unchanged in this culture, was returned to civilization as the Catalog of Human Population by its discoverer, researcher-sinologist Andrey Davydov and his colleagues.
-Why should I know manipulation modes of others, and why should I manipulate someone?
Regardless of which social class people belong to, whether they like it or not, they are connected with other people. A lion’s share of processes, in which a person participates, either way is contact with another person.
Since any individual normally lives among other people, the problem of knowledge and understanding of another person is everyone’s urgent need. However, to date there is no source (besides the Catalog of Human Population) in civilization, from which a specific John could learn how to communicate with a specific Tom or Mary.
And, not just communicate in some way, but to do it in that exact manner that John needs; and, not just get “whatever” from this communication, but strictly that what he personally needs. In an attempt to achieve this, John uses one method after another (as usual, designed “one for all”) until all methods are tried out, and something finally works at least to some extent. However, sometimes it is too late—the relationship is ruined, the contact is broken, and goals in regard to the opponent are not achieved.
We think that the root of this problem is fundamental difference of internal characteristics of one person versus another, despite the external similarity, and sometimes even kinship. Since it is impossible to distinguish subtypes of Homo sapiens based on appearance—it is much easier to tell a rabbit from a donkey, despite the fact that both have long ears. And, that might have very unpleasant consequences. Since in nature when one tries to interact with a wild wolf as with a dog, with an eagle as with a dove, and with a venomous snake as with a worm—the consequences are always fatal.
However, it is the same with people. Not knowing the person, with whom you come in contact, it is impossible to know what to expect from him/her and how to interact. Of course, unlike it is with animals, by interacting with another person inappropriately, in the physical sense you will not get bitten, scratched or torn into pieces. (Although sometimes this happens.) However, in psychological or, for example, financial sense—biting, scratching and tearing apart is not at all uncommon among people. Unfortunately, this type of “communication” occurs very, very often. As a result, after communicating with other people, a person very often has to “lick his wounds.”
However, in this respect the situation has changed cardinally due to the scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population, which was made by Andrey Davydov. Now in order to make any kind of contact it is not necessary to gather information about a person from third parties or from other sources of information, there is no longer a need to use the well-known “scientific method of trial and error,” and so on.
Any kind of contact (business, friendly, intimate, and so on) with any person is now done quite easily using other methods. In order to know what to expect, and what not to expect from a person, all that is needed is information about the individual program and manipulation modes of that person.
Application of this kind of information guarantees establishment of any type of required communicative contact and with any required results. Any interaction can easily be modeled using information about another person from the Catalog of human population. And, as a result, any person can get that what he planned, that what he wants and needs from another person.
The success of use of this technology is not affected by gender of the subject of interest, or by his/her age, educational level or professional affiliation, financial situation or belongingness to any social group. Information about another person from the Catalog of Human Souls allows anyone to have an ability to influence, make adjustments to behavior, plans, and objectives in relation to that person.
Consider any of the problems, for example, within tandems “husband-wife” (“lovers”), “parent-child” that we can safely state are common in 99.9 percent out of 100. The root cause of any one of them is the same: lack of knowledge of another person, inability to properly communicate with him, and inability to influence him. These are, so to speak, the “three pillars,” upon which in this civilization all communication between one person and another stands.
Only because of these “three pillars” parents at some point lose understanding of behavior of their children and control over their actions, and children are not able to “get through to parents,” to explain their needs, aspirations, life stance to them. Also, this is the only reason why at some stage men and women go in different directions and live separately—they are simply unable to neither find a person, with whom they would be happy, nor find a common language with a person, who for some reason they selected for family life or for other type of relationship. And so, they live apart, despite that both women and men, regardless of how old they are, do not want to be alone. They want to feel someone’s shoulder close to theirs, they want to be needed, loved, and wanted.
To us, all problems listed above seem unworthy of wasting one’s breath on, as they are easily solvable by using information from the Catalog of human population: the so-called search for “the other half,” and mutual understanding, and love between parents and children or between a husband and a wife, and how to find a common language with another person, and how to be liked, and how to influence, and so on.
So-called “ordinary people” can dream as much as they want that if he or she is not involved in something, from their point of view, serious and dangerous, they should not worry about their safety or preservation of their well-being. From our point of view, this is a very big delusion.
We live in a civilization where each one of us, figuratively speaking, lives his whole life in the area of active combat operations. Regardless of whether he knows about it or not, notices or does not notice it. It is just that the scale of these combat operations (without quotes) is different for different people: for some it is the process of conquest of economic and political influence over entire regions, and for some it is fighting over, figuratively speaking, a rusty frying pan.
It so happened that in this society that in any type of relationship between people—actions against each other cannot be classified in any other way except by the word ‘war’: in business areas, in so-called “friendship,” and even in families. And, in reality it is very difficult not to notice this fact. As a rule, it is not that people do not notice it, but they just do not want to think about it, hoping that their games of peaceful life with each other, their false assurances of friendship and love will protect them from an attack. No, they will not protect.
And, it should be noted that consequences of participation in such combat operations are just the same for a major politician as they are for an ordinary, simple citizen—pain, psychological, physical, financial and other damages, etc., up to physical destruction. War is war. Hence, the joke: “How do you feel, Joe?” – “Thank you, not well at all!” Life at war is difficult and it is even more difficult to survive. However, hiding in fantasies is not just pointless, but extremely dangerous.
The whole question is not in ambition since we faced the fact that ambitions of so-called “ordinary people” sometimes can be truly exorbitant, but in that what a person is capable of (himself, him personally); in what information he has, what he knows how to do, how he does it and does he do anything at all. Since sometimes people behave quite strangely; for example: they complain, get offended, upset, when someone reaches any success or surpasses them in their personal qualities in reality. These people are so used to being great and mighty in their fantasies that any encounter with real facts, which confirm that they are really not, make them very depressed and they feel hate towards other people. From our perspective, sometimes this reminds of a situation with a dog, which lazily wiggles its tail all day in anticipation of getting fed and petted, or sleeps, pretending that it protects the house during the breaks, and with the return of the master after a hard day of work is puzzled and upset after getting only bones off of a piece of meat.
Yes, usually no one physically destroys so-called “ordinary people” for their mistakes in communication, for misunderstanding and miscalculation of a situation, as it happens with, for example, politicians, officials, business leaders, etc. However, no one is immune to psychological destruction by another person or a group of people, which, as it is known, is followed by either physical destruction or, more commonly, physical self-destruction because psyche is primary. Usually this does not get taken into account right away, and when something happens it is usually too late to do anything about it—you, so to speak, got eaten. This society is a jungle, Ngorongoro, where predators hide behind masks of innocent white sheep.
-Why six factors, and not more?
Number of factors to describe primary programs could not be expanded, supplemented by some other factor. Despite a common misconception that at the first level of development Homo sapiens has so-called "spirituality"—information from the ancient text did not confirm this. The appearance of the factor of "spirituality" in humans is a separate topic.
-Homo sapiens is born with built-in “software”: individual (subtype) program and three manipulation modes.
In essence, the concept of human "software" (or, using scientific terms—"subtype structure" or "individual archetypal pattern"), "psyche," and "soul" are synonymous. The role of human "software" is huge. It is the basis of work of all human psychophysiology.
Human "software" is the natural subtype program of an individual and three manipulation modes as correctors to this program: suppression mode, balance mode and stimulation mode. A program and three manipulation modes are "soldered together," as elements of a unified system called "human psyche." Every human subtype has its own, unique natural program with three manipulation modes. More information about programs and manipulation modes of Homo sapiens will be provided below.
Human "software," using the computer terms, gets "installed" by nature at the time of birth. If we draw an analogy with other technics, an individual program and three manipulation modes of a person are, relatively speaking, "factory settings," meaning that an individual is created by nature specifically like that.
-How does a representative of one human subtype of Homo sapiens differ from a representative of another subtype?
It has long been noted that even though people are physiologically similar in principle (for example, they have two arms, two legs, two lungs, one heart, and do not have scales, a tail, horns, hooves, wings, feathers, etc.), they differ from each other in character, qualities of personality, life algorithms, values, preferences, and abilities. And, sometimes they differ cardinally On the other hand, there are people, who are similar to one another. This question remained a mystery to researchers for a long time, but with the discovery of the Catalog of human population it was resolved. It turned out that the reason is that humanity as a biological type is divided into subtypes.
It is exactly the same as it is arranged in the world of animals, birds, fish, plants, etc. Among birds exist hummingbirds, and eagles, and sparrows, and ostriches; among fish there is a shark, and a carp, and a guppy or a dwarf pygmy goby; among snakes there are anacondas, and vipers, and grass snakes; among dogs there are huge Great Danes, and miniature Italian Greyhounds. And, as it is known, anacondas do not live like vipers, sharks like carps, and Great Danes like Italian Greyhounds—they all lead different lifestyles, have different qualities, functionalities, and abilities. As it turned out, it is the same within the biological type Homo sapiens.
-What is HelpMates by Birthright dating algorithm based on?
Personal and business dating service Helpmates by Birthright is based on a unique technology called Birds of a Feather. This algorithm is used for matching partners for any type of relationship: love, sex, friendship, family, business, leisure, hobbies or some specific projects. Matching in our dating algorithm is based on a single criterion – client’s belonging to a particular subtype (one of 293 subtypes of the biological type Homo sapiens). Yes, this matching uses the exact date of birth of a client (see F.A.Q. related to date of birth here), but this has nothing to do with astrology or esoteric knowledge. This technology was created on the basis of scientific research, where a date of birth indicates phenological cycles and is in no way connected with the influence of celestial bodies, planets, numbers, etc. These studies are based on strictly scientific methods and data from many natural sciences (such as biology, zoology, mineralogy, botany, hydrology, soil science, etc.) and humanities (linguistics, psychology, cultural studies, etc.). These studies were carried out for over 40 years and tested for over 25 years (data for 2019). Please refer to the F.A.Q. if you are interested in more detailed information about these studies.
-Why are developers of the Catalog of Human Population and their colleagues opposed to cooperation with scientific and other public organizations?
First of all, on what grounds was the assumption made that developers of the Catalog of Human Population and their colleagues did not cooperate or do not cooperate with various public organizations? There is no mystery here. For example, information available here openly provides data about some public organizations, such as Russian universities and scientific research organizations, political organizations, law enforcement agencies and security services of Russian Federation. (Of course, this is not a complete list since the vast majority of organizations, which work closely with developers of the Catalog and their colleagues prefer not to advertise this.)
Secondly, why do you think that the staff of the Special Scientific Info-Analytical Laboratory—Catalog of Human Souls and the Human Population Academy are not open to new contacts? No one objected to this. Objected, object (and will object) only to that some try to fool us for over 20 years already—representatives of the academic environment, security services, politicians, businessmen. This refers to proposals to provide them information from the Catalog of Human Population for free. Moreover, academic institutions, and even more so security services either have a sufficient budget or unlimited budget, and are capable of paying money for these materials, while all this time developers of the Catalog and their colleagues carry out their research exclusively at their own expense.
-What do images from 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) look like?
The only monument that humanity preserved in its entirety and unchanged is 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing, translated as the Catalog of Mountains and Seas)—the richest collection of natural images that exists in this civilization.
These images seem quite fantastical, and for this reason, already for many centuries, they bring readers and researchers of this ancient manuscript to an impasse. For example: "...River Shi flows out of there, flows to the northeast and flows into the sea. There is an animal that looks similar to a wolf, but with a red head and eyes like a rat. It grunts like a piglet... There is a bird, similar to a rooster, but with a white head and legs like a mouse, claws like a tiger..."
The entire Shan Hai Jing contains similar material. This book has only images of similar kind and nothing else. Shan Hai Jing consists of 18 sections, and just 5 chapters related to section 1—Catalog of the Mountains—contain 15,503 hieroglyphs. And, behind most of these hieroglyphs are objects of the surrounding nature. However, all images from Shan Hai Jing are natural images because they are images, on the basis of which psychophysiology of any representative of human population was created and functions. These are not just images—they are images of natural human programs and manipulation modes. And, from these images, it is possible to find out anything you want to know about any person.
-Why natural human manipulation modes are the only alternative to violence? And, what about manipulation ethics?
From our point of view, manipulation modes of a human were created by nature as the only way of effective, constructive, non-deforming, and secure communication.
Based on that application of natural manipulation modes in communication with any person always exceptionally favorable affects his psychophysiology (and not on the basis of the meanings of what manipulation is usually considered)—these modes were named manipulation modes. Contrary to the belief, which is popular both in psychology and in everyday life that manipulation is always a process with a negative connotation, we consider manipulation based on other meanings from dictionaries. We consider manipulation to be any purposeful action with a subject (refer to a dictionary).
From our perspective, communicative impact that leads to actualization of quite specific motivational states in a subject, and makes him behave in a certain way, should not necessarily be beneficial to the manipulator and not beneficial to the subject of manipulation.
From our point of view, this directly depends on ethical and moral qualities of a person applying manipulation modes towards another person. Just like a knife cannot be regarded only as a murder weapon. A knife as a tool can also be used for cooking, as a scalpel in the hands of a surgeon, and so forth.
Of course, being very powerful, this purely natural mechanism can be used by some to have the other person submit, in order to use him for some purposes. Indeed, when personal manipulation modes are applied to a human, he or she forms a complete willingness to do anything for the manipulator. However, we consider use of natural manipulation modes with immoral goals—inhumane, immoral, and contrary to nature.
Whether someone likes the fact that any person has a natural mechanism called “manipulation modes” or not—it exists anyway. And, the important thing is that this is how nature arranged it. Therefore, in the absence of the Catalog of human population it is, of course, possible to continue to treat Homo sapiens like an animal, while discussing humanism, goodness, morality and other things unrelated to this process. This is widely practiced in this society. Consider a method that in the case of animals is called training, and in the case of a human for some reason is referred to by different words: upbringing, re-education, etc. Zoopsychologists are very well familiar with this method as the “method of positive and negative reinforcement;” animals are trained using with method.
However, unlike subtype programs of animals, in which only instincts and primitive reflexes are recorded, human programs consist of much more than that. From our point of view, Pavlov’s (a Russian researcher, who was involved in elaboration of certain reflexes in dogs) method that has become popular worldwide should not be practically the only available method of influence on a human being in the XXI century. Influence of a human must be based on more complex principles than induction of salivation.
Our studies have shown that human manipulation modes are a subtype’s peculiar language. If a person is not spoken to in this “language,” then he practically does not hear his interlocutor, does not want to understand him, does not accept or simply rejects him. Our research of Shan Hai Jing showed a firm link between this “subtype language” and individual subtype program, meaning—human soul. Therefore, knowledge and use of natural “language of the soul,” meaning manipulation modes of a person, allows to not degrade him by treating him like an animal. And, this makes the use of violence against a person in order to motivate him to some actions or psychophysiological states unnecessary. A human does not need to be forced, it is not necessary to demand something from him—all that is necessary is to communicate with him using his "subtype language," which is the language of his natural program and manipulation modes.
-What is the difference between a woman’s and a man’s natural program within one subtype?
Men and women within one human subtype differ from each other in the same way as females and males within one subspecies of, for example, animals. They have identical personal characteristics, psychophysiological algorithms, lifestyle, and functionality. Some differences might be present in the sexual factor; for example, in attitudes towards offspring. In nature, females of some species of animals care for their offspring without participation of males; females make males leave their offspring; not only males, but also females of some species do not engage in caring for their offspring at all; or, for example, a male and a female of some types of birds engage in upbringing of their nestlings together and distribute parenting duties equally. However, as mentioned above, these differences are not fundamental.
-Natural and artificial “software” of Homo sapiens.
A human and a computer have a similarity: both do not work without software. A computer without "software" is a useless pile of metal; a human without "software" is a body, life in which is supported by automatic physiological processes, but he will never function like a human. Today almost everyone is familiar with computer software, but not many are familiar with human "software." Even though, as it turned out, human "software" is the "soul," which people were looking for so hard for centuries, but could not find.
Human "software" can be natural, as well as artificially created by people themselves.
Nature gives "software" to every person from birth as a base, without which any bio-robot, including a human, cannot live. Without even coming close to that natural "software" is provided by nature to every person from birth, civilization came up with a lot of modifications of artificial "software." People had to live somehow since by nature it is arranged so that a person cannot live without a program at all, and the Catalog human population, where every person could find out his natural program was lost.
However, the trouble is that artificial "software" (meaning, "software" invented by people) differs from natural in the same way as plastic apples differ from natural apples. That is not surprising because even at the current level of technological development of this civilization, a human is not able to create anything that would be equal to natural; quality of that what he creates is always worse. Let’s go back to "plastic apples": such a "diet" quickly leads to death of a human. In this civilization, in the best case, people live for several decades, instead of centuries, as they could live according to studies done by physiologists.
In essence, life based on artificial "software" that replaces the natural program of an individual, turns him into a living corpse while he is still alive. Life on artificial "software" leads to colossally rapid deterioration of the entire human psychophysiology, premature aging and early death. Only a few percent of the potential that is implanted in a person (and, which would allow him to heal and rejuvenate himself) gets realized and a person has nothing else left, but to die from diseases and old age.
And, during the time period between birth and death, for the most part, a person’s life is difficult, full of problems. Is it not this process and result that are described in mythologies of almost all nations of the world: a shift from the Golden Age, in which all people lived for many years, happily and without problems to the Iron Age, tainted and cruel, when "men never rest from labour and sorrow by day, and from perishing by night" (Hesiod, VII-VII century BC, Works and Days, Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/hesiod/works.htm)?
Artificial "software," like hydrochloric acid, corrodes a person from the inside. As it is known, concentrated hydrochloric acid turns contents of a stomach into a bloody mess. A chemical burn of this kind does not always end instantaneously, sometimes doctors save a person by removing the insides, but a person lives the rest of his life severely disabled and dies before his time. And, at any stage a person is in hellish pain because of this. Is this not the same process that we can observe around us: life in misery, and then death, in 100% out of 100 cases?
No person in his lifetime is able to fall outside the scope of his natural program without damage to himself. And, everything that Homo sapiens try to make out of themselves by creating artificial programs, as replacements of their natural programs, in terms of nature are mutations. In nature all mutants automatically "go under the knife." Automatically—means that if functioning of an individual falls outside the scope of his natural program, then nature automatically regards this as a threat to existence of the whole natural system, and the program of self-destruction automatically turns on in that individual.
Probably, this is why lives of Homo sapiens in this civilization are so short. After all, according to physiologists—by nature a human body is designed for a healthy, normal and youthful life of a few hundred years. And, this is confirmed by the ancient sources; for example, in descriptions of lives of biblical characters, which most people are familiar with. One of them—Methuselah—lived 969 years according to some sources. Or is the Bible wrong?
Artificial "software" is the root of absolutely any problem of an individual, as well as society as a whole. "Software" created by a human for himself and for other people can be compared to the most dangerous computer virus, which breaks the entire system; to a virus, which there is not a single chance to get rid of, except for doing "a factory reset," cleaning "the disk" called "the soul" of everything extraneous, everything that is not related to the natural "software." And, today this is possible since the Catalog of human population, which is the collection of descriptions of human programs, was found and returned to civilization.
Artificial schemes that people come up with as programs for life are unable to completely turn off their natural "software." Simultaneous work of both natural and artificial "software," first of all, makes the life of an individual very uncomfortable, as these two "programs" come into a conflict, which does not end until death. Secondly, this is very similar to trying to sit on two chairs at once. And, the result is the same. Trying to resolve this conflict, but not knowing his natural program, at some point an individual completely switches over to artificial "software." The trouble is that when he "succeeds"—he dies right away; a person is alive only while his natural program works. Therefore, natural "software" of people, which is described in the Catalog of human population, always corresponds to real people. And, this is easily observable.
-How does one individual differ from another, as representatives of the same subtype of Homo sapiens?
In principle, they do not differ in anything. Externally, representatives of the same human subtype, unlike animals of the same subtype, might differ, including by the color of their skin, for example. However, they have the same qualities of personality, lifestyle, abilities, and functionalities. Despite that externally representatives of one subtype of biological type "human" usually do not look similar, their internal physiological processes are analogous. For example, if we consider the possibility of normal existence in different temperature regimes, then that what is natural and desirable for a representative of one human subtype might be completely unacceptable to a representative of another, etc.
This occurs because all physiological processes are determined by the structure of psyche, and it is identical for all representatives of one human subtype. Representatives of the same subtype of Homo sapiens are born with the same subtype program, and therefore, in terms of psychical structure they are identical. The structure of psyche (subtype program) is a natural imprint, a matrix, and it does not change from individual to individual within a subtype.
Social environment, upbringing, cultural traditions, and education introduce some adjustments, but they are minor since they do not change the essential—subtype structure ("program") of a person. Real differences between people are defined specifically by the natural subtype program, nothing else.
The study of Shan Hai Jing revealed that every person, belonging to some subtype, has stable characteristic properties of this subtype; and, regardless of race, nationality, place of birth and residence, parental guidance, and so on, as these are only minor correctors, which do not change a subtype program. Though, the same pattern is observed with animals. Living in different areas (as some animal subspecies, as well as human subspecies can be found almost all over the globe), the representatives of the same subtype may have different adaptive properties, but these properties do not in any way alter the subtype program: a horse remains a horse, a bear remains a bear, a bull does not turn into a ram, and a snake does not become a crocodile. Only here it will be a pony, somewhere else a percheron, and elsewhere—an Arabian horse. Regardless of the territory where an animal lives, it retains stable properties of its subtype. We see a similar situation with humans: the representatives of the same human subtype might have different skin color, be of different nationalities, but each retains those personal qualities, life algorithms, preferences, talents, functioning that are inherent in his subtype.
Cultural factors, national traditions, even parental upbringing (which, by the way, plays a big role for representatives of some subtypes) are only additions, layers, and do not alter the subtype program of a human. Since, in the case of biological species Homo sapiens, children are not direct continuation of their parents, as it is the case with animals. More often than not, children and parents are members of different subtypes.
-Why is a dating service offered on scientific lab’s and academy’s website?
Many wonder why HelpMate(s) By Birthright personal and business dating service is offered on such a serious scientific research based website. The answer is quite simple: because the main topic and result of scientific research of the Special Scientific Info-Analytical Laboratory—Catalog of Human Souls is the ancient Chinese literary monument Shan Hai Jing, which turned out to be the Catalog of Human Population that describes deep (psycho-genetic) structures of human psyche of 293 subtypes of the biological type Homo sapiens (meaning, the entire human population) and has a wide range of practical applications. It can be stated that the Catalog of Human Population can be applied in absolutely all areas where a human is present, including technological areas (see a list of specific areas here.) Among all these areas of practical application of the Catalog of Human Population, a huge and very important segment for each person is the sphere of human relations/communications of any kind: business, romantic and family relations, groups by interest, communities, etc. Since relationships are a significant part of any person’s life, one of our goals is to help people be happy in relationships. There is a saying in the scientific community: “Theory without practice is dead,” which means that any scientific research does not makes sense if it has no practical application. HelpMate(s) By Birthright personal and business dating service was created directly on this website in order to give any person an opportunity to test it on practice right after a brief introduction to the theory, and absolutely free of charge. Human Population Academy and Special Scientific Info-Analytical Laboratory—Catalog of Human Souls serve not only educational purposes through this, but also contribute to the solution of one of the top social problems—the problem of communication between people.
-I’m a woman. Do I need manipulation scenario of a female or a male?
Selection of gender for a manipulation scenario depends on the client’s goal:
1. SELF-KNOWLEDGE - If a person wants to get his/her personal natural manipulation modes in order to become inaccessible to manipulation and in order to be able to regulate his/her psyche and physiology, then the gender of a manipulation scenario can be any—it does not need to match gender of the client.
2. CONTROL OF ANOTHER PERSON - In this case, gender of a manipulation scenario matters.
- Suppressing Manipulation Mode - If a client wants to manipulate another person through application of his/her suppression mode and use the sexual factor, then the gender of a manipulation scenario must match the client's gender. If the client is not interested in sexual relations with a subject of manipulation (for example, business contacts, etc.), then the client can order the suppressing manipulation mode scenario of any gender.
- Balancing Manipulation Mode – In this case, the rule is the same as with the suppressing manipulation mode.
- Stimulating Manipulation Mode - Gender of the stimulating manipulation mode scenario depends on the goal of manipulation. In some cases, it must match gender of the client, while in others—gender of the scenario must match gender of the subject of manipulation.
More information about application of manipulation modes is available in the book series titled Catalog of Human Souls and through private consultations (see https://www.humanpopulationacademy.org/pricing/private-consultations/), as well as classes (see https://www.humanpopulationacademy.org/pricing/global-distance-learning/).
-Why and in which cases children are not antenna-like continuations of their biological parents?
As it turned out with the discovery of the Catalog of human population—since humanity as a biological type is divided into 293 subtypes, having a purely external similarity ("exterior") a child does not inherit natural psychophysiological characteristics of his biological parents, except for when he is a representative of the same subtype as one of his parents (a mother or a father).
In the case of representatives of the biological type "human," children are not antenna-like continuations of their biological parents, as it is the case in the world of animals and plants. In the world of Homo sapiens in most cases parents raise a representative or representatives who are not the same as their own subtype. This is the root cause of the well-known "problem of parents and children." This is why children, even though they resemble their parents externally, in most cases do not get all characteristics and qualities of their characters, do not copy their way of life exactly as it happens in the animal world. And, sometimes they cardinally differ from their parents by nature.
As for similarity of characters, habits, attitudes, etc. observed in parents and children—this has nothing to do with their nature, and is only related to artificial "software." We have fully researched this issue and it is described using popular language in the book called "Ahnenerbe"—Your Killer Is Under Your Skin by A. Davydov and O. Skorbatyuk.